|Did you know ...||Search Documentation:|
|Answer subsumption or mode directed tabling|
Tabling as defined above has a serious limitation. Although the definition of connection/2 from section section 7.2 can compute the transitive closure of connected cities, it cannot provide you with a route to travel. The reason is that there are infinitely many routes if there are cycles in the network and each new route found will be added to the answer table and cause the tabled execution's completion algorithm to search for more routes, eventually running out of memory.
The solution to this problem is called mode directed tabling
term answer subsumption is used by XSB and mode directed
tabling by YAP and B-Prolog. The idea is that some arguments are
considered `outputs', where multiple values for the same `input' are
combined. Possibly answer aggregation would have been a better
name. In this execution model one or more arguments are not
added to the table. Instead, we remember a single aggregated
value for these arguments. The example below is derived from
and returns the connection as a list of cities. This argument is defined
as a moded argument using the
mode is compatible to XSB Prolog. This causes the tabling
engine each time that it finds an new path to call shortest/3 and keep
the shortest route.
:- table connection(_,_,lattice(shortest/3)). shortest(P1, P2, P):- length(P1, L1), length(P2, L2), ( L1 < L2 -> P = P1 ; P = P2 ). connection(X, Y, [X,Y]) :- connection(X, Y). connection(X, Y, P) :- connection(X, Z, P0), connection(Z, Y), append(P0, [Y], P).
The mode declation scheme is equivalent to XSB with partial
compatibility support for YAP and B-Prolog. The
mode is the most general mode. The YAP
mode is not yet supported. The list below describes the supported modes
and indicates the portability.
index(YAP) or a
(B-Prolog, YAP) declare that the argument is tabled normally.
Name(_,_,_). On each answer, PI is called with three arguments: the current aggregated answer and the new answer are inputs. The last argument must be unified with a term that represents the new aggregated answer.
call(PI, +Old, +Answer)succeeds. For example,
po('<'/2)accumulates the largest result. In SWI-Prolog the arity (2) may be omitted, resulting in
(B-Prolog, YAP) and
first(YAP) declare to keep the first answer for this argument.
last(YAP) declares to keep the last answer.
min(YAP) declares to keep the smallest answer according to the standard order of terms (see @</2). Note that in SWI-Prolog the standard order of terms orders numbers by value.
max(YAP) declares to keep the largest answer according to the standard order of terms (see @>/2). Note that in SWI-Prolog the standard order of terms orders numbers by value.
sum(YAP) declares to sum numeric answers.