Did you know? SWI-Prolog has an RDF Semantic Web ServerSearch Documentation:

- Home
- DOWNLOAD
- DOCUMENTATION
- TUTORIALS
- Beginner▶
- Intermediate▶
- Advanced▶

- COMMUNITY
- USERS
- WIKI

SWI-Prolog supports rational trees, also known as cyclic terms. `Supports' is so defined that most relevant built-in predicates terminate when faced with rational trees. Almost all SWI-Prolog's built-in term manipulation predicates process terms in a time that is linear to the amount of memory used to represent the term on the stack. The following set of predicates safely handles rational trees: =../2, ==/2, =@=/2, =/2, @</2, @=</2, @>=/2, @>/2, \==/2, \=@=/2, \=/2, acyclic_term/1, bagof/3, compare/3, copy_term/2, cyclic_term/1, dif/2, duplicate_term/2, findall/3, ground/1, term_hash/2, numbervars/3, numbervars/4, recorda/3, recordz/3, setof/3, subsumes_term/2, term_variables/2, throw/1, unify_with_occurs_check/2, unifiable/3, when/2, write/1 (and related predicates) .

In addition, some built-ins recognise rational trees and raise an
appropriate exception. Arithmetic evaluation belongs to this group. The
compiler (asserta/1,
etc.) also raises an exception. Future versions may support rational
trees. Predicates that could provide meaningful processing of rational
trees raise a `representation_error`

. Predicates for which
rational trees have no meaningful interpretation raise a `type_error`

.
For example:

1 ?- A = f(A), asserta(a(A)). ERROR: asserta/1: Cannot represent due to `cyclic_term' 2 ?- A = 1+A, B is A. ERROR: is/2: Type error: `expression' expected, found `@(S_1,[S_1=1+S_1])' (cyclic term)

Tag confusing pages with **doc-needs-help**|Tags are associated to your profile if you are logged in

Tags: