|Did you know ...||Search Documentation:|
|SWI-Prolog SSL Interface|
Raw TCP/IP networking is dangerous for two reasons:
Transport Layer Security (TLS) and its predecessor Secure Socket Layer (SSL), which are both often collectively called SSL, solve both problems. SSL uses:
SSL allows agents to talk in private and create secure web services.
library(ssl) library provides an API to
turn a pair of arbitrary Prolog wire streams into SSL powered
encrypted streams. Note that secure protocols such as secure HTTP simply
run the plain protocol over (SSL) encrypted streams.
library(crypto) library provides additional
predicates related to cryptography and authentication, secure hashes and
Cryptography is a difficult topic. If you just want to download documents from an HTTPS server without worrying much about security, http_open/3 will do the job for you. As soon as you have higher security demands we strongly recommend you to read enough background material to understand what you are doing. See section 5 for some remarks regarding this implementation. This The Linux Documentation Project page provides some additional background and tips for managing certificates and keys.
An SSL server and client can be built with the (abstracted) predicate
calls from the table below. The
tcp_ predicates are
library(socket). The predicate ssl_context/3
defines properties of the SSL connection, while ssl_negotiate/5
establishes the SSL connection based on the wire streams created by the
TCP predicates and the context.
The SSL Server The SSL Client ssl_context/3 ssl_context/3 tcp_socket/1 tcp_accept/3 tcp_connect/3 tcp_open_socket/3 stream_pair/3 ssl_negotiate/5 ssl_negotiate/5
The library is abstracted to communication over streams, and is not
reliant on those streams being directly attached to sockets. The
calls here are simply the most common way to use the library. Other
two-way communication channels such as (named), pipes can just as easily
client. Otherwise, certificate verification may fail when negotiating a secure connection.
key_file(+FileName)option. A server must have at least one certificate before clients can connect. A client must have a certificate only if the server demands the client to identify itself with a client certificate using the
peer_cert(true)option. If a certificate is provided, it is necessary to also provide a matching private key via the key_file/1 option. To configure multiple certificates, use the option certificate_key_pairs/1 instead. Alternatively, use ssl_add_certificate_key/4 to add certificates and keys to an existing context.
call(Goal, +SSL, -Password)and typically unifies Password with a string containing the password.
require_crl(true)and provide neither of these options, verification will necessarily fail
require_crl(true)if you want CRLs to actually be checked by OpenSSL.
system(root_certificates)uses a list of trusted root certificates as provided by the OS. See system_root_certificates/1 for details.
Additional verification of the peer certificate as well as accepting certificates that are not trusted by the given set can be realised using the hook cert_verify_hook(:Goal).
call(Goal, +SSL, +ProblemCertificate, +AllCertificates, +FirstCertificate, +Error)
In case the certificate was verified by one of the provided
certifications from the
cacert_file option, Error is
unified with the atom
verified. Otherwise it contains the
error string passed from OpenSSL. Access will be granted iff the
predicate succeeds. See load_certificate/2
for a description of the certificate terms. See cert_accept_any/5
for a dummy implementation that accepts any certificate.
prime256v1is used by default.
true, close the raw streams if the SSL streams are closed. Default is
false), the server sends TLS
close_notifywhen closing the connection. In addition, this mitigates truncation attacks for both client and server role: If EOF is encountered without having received a TLS shutdown, an exception is raised. Well-designed protocols are self-terminating, and this attack is therefore very rarely a concern.
tlsv1_2. This option is available with OpenSSL 1.1.0 and later, and should be used instead of
tlsv1_2. This option is available with OpenSSL 1.1.0 and later, and should be used instead of
tlsv1_2. This option is deprecated starting with OpenSSL 1.1.0. Use min_protocol_version/1 and max_protocol_version/1 instead.
disable_ssl_methodsabove. Using this option is discouraged. When using OpenSSL 1.1.0 or later, this option is ignored, and a version-flexible method is used to negotiate the connection. Using version-specific methods is deprecated in recent OpenSSL versions, and this option will become obsolete and ignored in the future.
call(Goal, +SSL0, +HostName, -SSL)
Given the current context SSL0, and the host name of the client request, the predicate computes SSL which is used as the context for negotiating the connection. The first solution is used. If the predicate fails, the default options are used, which are those of the encompassing ssl_context/3 call. In that case, if no default certificate and key are specified, the client connection is rejected.
|Role||is one of |
|SSL||is a SWI-Prolog blob of type |
This predicate allows dual-stack RSA and ECDSA servers (for example),
and is an alternative for using the
certificate_key_pairs/1 option. As of OpenSSL 1.0.2,
multiple certificate types with completely independent certificate
chains are supported. If a certificate of the same type is added
repeatedly to a context, the result is undefined. Currently, up to 12
additional certificates of different types are admissible.
After a successful handshake and finishing the communication the user
must close SSLRead and SSLWrite, for example using
call_cleanup(close(SSLWrite), close(SSLRead)). If the SSL
context (created with ssl_context/3
has the option
false), closing SSLRead
SSLWrite also closes the original PlainRead and PlainWrite
streams. Otherwise these must be closed explicitly by the user.
ssl_error(Code, LibName, FuncName, Reason)is raised if the negotiation fails. The streams PlainRead and PlainWrite are not closed, but an unknown amount of data may have been read and written.
http_open(HTTPS_url, In, ), ssl_peer_certificate(In, Cert), memberchk(subject(Subject), Cert), memberchk('CN' = CommonName), Subject)
Note that the OpenSSL
CA.pl utility creates certificates
that have a human readable textual representation in front of the PEM
representation. You can use the following to skip to the certificate if
you know it is a PEM certificate:
skip_to_pem_cert(In) :- repeat, ( peek_char(In, '-') -> ! ; skip(In, 0'\n), at_end_of_stream(In), ! ).
system(root_certificates). The list is obtained using an OS specific process. The current implementation is as follows:
"ROOT"certificates from the OS.
system_cacert_filename. The initial value of this flag is operating system dependent. For security reasons, the flag can only be set prior to using the SSL library. For example:
:- use_module(library(ssl)). :- set_prolog_flag(system_cacert_filename, '/home/jan/ssl/ca-bundle.crt').
private_key(KeyTerm)where KeyTerm is an rsa/8 term representing an RSA key, or ec/3 for EC keys.
public_key(KeyTerm)where KeyTerm is an rsa/8 term representing an RSA key, or ec/3 for EC keys.
http_open('https:/...', In, [ cert_verify_hook(cert_accept_any) ])
Note that obsolete ciphers must be disabled to reliably prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
The Ciphers list is read from the setting
and can be controlled using set_setting/2
and other predicates from
BEWARE: This list must be changed when attacks on these ciphers become known! Keep an eye on this setting and adapt it as necessary in the future.
This library provides bindings to functionality of OpenSSL that is related to cryptography and authentication, not necessarily involving connections, sockets or streams.
Almost all cryptographic applications require the availability of numbers that are sufficiently unpredictable. Examples are the creation of keys, nonces and salts. With this library, you can generate cryptographically strong pseudo-random numbers for such use cases:
One way to relate such a list of bytes to an integer is to use CLP(FD) constraints as follows:
:- use_module(library(clpfd)). bytes_integer(Bs, N) :- foldl(pow, Bs, 0-0, N-_). pow(B, N0-I0, N-I) :- B in 0..255, N #= N0 + B*256^I0, I #= I0 + 1.
With this definition, you can generate a random 256-bit integer from a list of 32 random bytes:
?- crypto_n_random_bytes(32, Bs), bytes_integer(Bs, I). Bs = [98, 9, 35, 100, 126, 174, 48, 176, 246|...], I = 109798276762338328820827...(53 digits omitted).
The above relation also works in the other direction, letting you translate an integer to a list of bytes. In addition, you can use hex_bytes/2 to convert bytes to tokens that can be easily exchanged in your applications. This also works if you have compiled SWI-Prolog without support for large integers.
A hash, also called digest, is a way to verify the integrity of data. In typical cases, a hash is significantly shorter than the data itself, and already miniscule changes in the data lead to different hashes.
The hash functionality of this library subsumes and extends that of
by providing a unified interface to all available digest algorithms.
The underlying OpenSSL library (
dynamically loaded if
are loaded. Therefore, if your application uses
you can use
library(crypto) for hashing without increasing
the memory footprint of your application. In other cases, the
specialised hashing libraries are more lightweight but less general
The most important predicates to compute hashes are:
BLAKEdigest algorithms require OpenSSL 1.1.0 or greater.
utf8. The other meaningful value is
octet, claiming that Data contains raw bytes.
|Data||is either an atom, string or code-list|
|Hash||is an atom that represents the hash.|
For the important case of deriving hashes from passwords, the following specialised predicates are provided:
crypto_password_hash(Password, Hash, )and computes a password-based hash using the default options.
Another important distinction is that equal passwords must yield, with very high probability, different hashes. For this reason, cryptographically strong random numbers are automatically added to the password before a hash is derived.
Hash is unified with an atom that contains the computed hash and all parameters that were used, except for the password. Instead of storing passwords, store these hashes. Later, you can verify the validity of a password with crypto_password_hash/2, comparing the then entered password to the stored hash. If you need to export this atom, you should treat it as opaque ASCII data with up to 255 bytes of length. The maximal length may increase in the future.
Admissible options are:
pbkdf2-sha512, which is therefore also the default.
^C. Currently, the default is 17, and thus more than one hundred thousand iterations. You should set this option as high as your server and users can tolerate. The default is subject to change and will likely increase in the future or adapt to new algorithms.
Currently, PBKDF2 with SHA-512 is used as the hash derivation function, using 128 bits of salt. All default parameters, including the algorithm, are subject to change, and other algorithms will also become available in the future. Since computed hashes store all parameters that were used during their derivation, such changes will not affect the operation of existing deployments. Note though that new hashes will then be computed with the new default parameters.
The following predicate implements the Hashed Message Authentication Code (HMAC)-based key derivation function, abbreviated as HKDF. It supports a wide range of applications and requirements by concentrating possibly dispersed entropy of the input keying material and then expanding it to the desired length. The number and lengths of the output keys depend on the specific cryptographic algorithms for which the keys are needed.
Admissible options are:
octet, denoting the representation of Data as in crypto_data_hash/3.
info/1 option can be used to generate multiple keys
from a single master key, using for example values such as
iv, or the name of a file that is to be encrypted.
This predicate requires OpenSSL 1.1.0 or greater.
The following predicates are provided for building hashes incrementally. This works by first creating a context with crypto_context_new/2, then using this context with crypto_data_context/3 to incrementally obtain further contexts, and finally extract the resulting hash with crypto_context_hash/2.
|Context||is an opaque pure Prolog term that is subject to garbage collection.|
This predicate allows a hash to be computed in chunks, which may be important while working with Metalink (RFC 5854), BitTorrent or similar technologies, or simply with big files.
The following hashing predicates work over streams:
true(default), closing the filter stream also closes the original (parent) stream.
In the context of this library, bytes can be represented as lists of integers between 0 and 255. Such lists can be converted to and from hexadecimal notation with the following bidirectional relation:
?- hex_bytes('501ACE', Bs). Bs = [80, 26, 206].
A digital signature is a relation between a key and data that only someone who knows the key can compute.
Signing uses a private key, and verifying a signature uses the corresponding public key of the signing entity. This library supports both RSA and ECDSA signatures. You can use load_private_key/3 and load_public_key/2 to load keys from files and streams.
In typical cases, we use this mechanism to sign the hash of data. See hashing (section 3.3). For this reason, the following predicates work on the hexadecimal representation of hashes that is also used by crypto_data_hash/3 and related predicates.
Signatures are also represented in hexadecimal notation, and you can use hex_bytes/2 to convert them to and from lists of bytes (integers).
hex) assumes that Data is an atom, string, character list or code list representing the data in hexadecimal notation. See rsa_sign/4 for an example.
hex. Alternatives are
hex. Alternatives are
hex. Alternatives are
This predicate can be used to compute a
signature as follows:
sha256_with_rsa(PemKeyFile, Password, Data, Signature) :- Algorithm = sha256, read_key(PemKeyFile, Password, Key), crypto_data_hash(Data, Hash, [algorithm(Algorithm), encoding(octet)]), rsa_sign(Key, Hash, Signature, [type(Algorithm)]). read_key(File, Password, Key) :- setup_call_cleanup( open(File, read, In, [type(binary)]), load_private_key(In, Password, Key), close(In)).
hex. Alternatives are
The following predicates provide asymmetric RSA encryption and decryption. This means that the key that is used for encryption is different from the one used to decrypt the data:
utf8. Alternatives are
pkcs1. Alternatives are
none. Note that
noneshould only be used if you implement cryptographically sound padding modes in your application code as encrypting unpadded data with RSA is insecure
The following predicates provide symmetric encryption and decryption:
If the initalization vector is not needed for your decryption algorithm (such as aes-128-ecb) then any string can be provided as it will be ignored by the underlying implementation.
utf8. Alternatives are
block. You can disable padding by supplying
Example of aes-128-cbc encryption:
?- crypto_n_random_bytes(16, IV), evp_encrypt("this is some input", 'aes-128-cbc', "sixteenbyteofkey", IV, CipherText, ), evp_decrypt(CipherText, 'aes-128-cbc', "sixteenbyteofkey", IV, RecoveredText, ). Bs = [244, 240, 64, 101, 117, 42, 115, 154, 30|...], IV = <binary atom> CipherText = <binary string> RecoveredText = "this is some input".
Note the use of crypto_n_random_bytes/2 to generate an initialization vector from cryptographically secure random numbers. This ensures semantic security: With very high probability, even identical plain texts will yield different cipher texts. It is safe to store and transfer the used initialization vector (in plain text) together with the encrypted data. You can use crypto_password_hash/3 in combination with crypto_data_hkdf/4 to create keys from user-supplied passwords.
This library provides operations from number theory that frequently arise in cryptographic applications, complementing the existing built-ins and GMP bindings:
false), then a safe prime is generated. This means that P is of the form 2*Q + 1 where Q is also prime.
This library provides functionality for reasoning over elliptic curves. Elliptic curves are represented as opaque objects. You acquire a handle for an elliptic curve via crypto_name_curve/2.
A point on a curve is represented by the Prolog term
where X and Y are integers that represent the
point's affine coordinates.
The following predicates are provided for reasoning over elliptic curves:
If you have OpenSSL installed, you can get a list of supported curves via:
$ openssl ecparam -list_curves
As one example that involves most predicates of this library, we explain a way to establish a shared secret over an insecure channel. We shall use elliptic curves for this purpose.
Suppose Alice wants to establish an encrypted connection with Bob. To achieve this even over a channel that may be subject to eavesdrooping and man-in-the-middle attacks, Bob performs the following steps:
This mechanism hinges on a way for Alice to establish the authenticity of the signed message (using predicates like rsa_verify/4 and ecdsa_verify/4), for example by means of a public key that was previously exchanged or is signed by a trusted party in such a way that Alice can be sufficiently certain that it belongs to Bob. However, none of these steps require any encryption!
Alice in turn performs the following steps:
Bob receives j*G in plain text and can arrive at the same shared secret by performing the calculation k*(j*G), which is - by associativity and commutativity of scalar multiplication - identical to the point j*(k*G), which is again Q from which the shared secret can be derived, and the message can be decrypted with evp_decrypt/6.
This method is known as Diffie-Hellman-Merkle key exchange over elliptic curves, abbreviated as ECDH. It provides forward secrecy (FS): Even if the private key that was used to establish the authenticity of Bob is later compromised, the encrypted messages cannot be decrypted with it.
A major attraction of using elliptic curves for this purpose is found in the comparatively small key size that suffices to make any attacks unrealistic as far as we currently know. In particular, given any point on the curve, we currently have no efficient way to determine by which scalar the generator was multiplied to obtain that point. The method described above relies on the hardness of this so-called elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem (ECDLP). On the other hand, some of the named curves have been suspected to be chosen in such a way that they could be prone to attacks that are not publicly known.
As an alternative to ECDH, you can use the original DH key exchange scheme, where the prime field GF(p) is used instead of an elliptic curve, and exponentiation of a suitable generator is used instead of scalar multiplication. You can use crypto_generate_prime/3 to generate a sufficiently large prime for this purpose.
The SSL package provides several libraries dealing with cryptographic
operations of XML documents. These libraries depend on the
package. These libraries are part of this package because the
sgml package has no external dependencies and will thus be
available in any SWI-Prolog installation while configuring and building
ssl package is much more involved.
There are four primary integration points for applications to use this code: 1) You must declare at least one service provider (SP) 2) You must declare at least one identity provider (IdP) per SP 3) Finally, you can call
saml_authenticate(+SP, +IdP, +Callback, +Request)to obtain assertions The asynchronous nature of the SAML process means that a callback must be used. Assuming that the IdP was able to provide at least some valid assertions about the user, after calling Callback with 2 extra arguments (a list of the assertion terms and the URL being request by the user), the user will be redirected back to their original URL. It is therefore up to the callback to ensure that this does not simply trigger another round of SAML negotiations - for example, by throwing
http_reply(forbidden(RequestURL))if the assertions are not strong enough 4) Finally, your SP metadata will be available from the web server directly. This is required to configure the IdP. This will be available at './metadata.xml', relative to the LocationSpec provided when the SP was declared.
saml_sp(+ServiceProvider: atom, +LocationSpec: term, +PrivateKeySpec: term, +Password: atom +CertificateSpec: term, +Options: list).
The ServiceProvider is the identifier of your service. Ideally, this should be a fully-qualified URI The LocationSpec is a location that the HTTP dispatch layer will understand for example '.' or
root('saml'). The Private KeySpec is a 'file specifier' that resolves to a private key (see below for specifiers) The Password is a password used for reading the private key. If the key is not encrypted, any atom can be supplied as it will be ignored The CertificateSpec is a file specifier that resolves to a certificate holding the public key corresponding to PrivateKeySPec There are currently no implemented options (the list is ignored).
saml_idp(+ServiceProvider: atom, +MetadataSpec: term). ServiceProvider is the identifier used when declaring your SP. You do not need to declare them in a particular order, but both must be present in the system before running saml_authenticate/4. MetadataSpec is a file specifier that resolves to the metadata for the IdP. Most IdPs will be able to provide this on request
File Specifiers: The following specifiers are supported for locating files:
file(Filename): The local file Filename
resource(Resource): The prolog resource Resource. See resource/3
url(URL): The file identified by the HTTP (or HTTPS if you have the HTTPS plugin loaded) URL
This library uses SAML to exchange messages with an Identity Provider to establish assertions about the current user's session. It operates only as the service end, not the identity provider end.
This library is a partial implementation of the XML encryption standard. It implements the decryption part, which is needed by SAML clients.
|KeyCallback||may be called as follows:
This library deals with XMLDSIG, RSA signed XML documents.
The SignedDOM must be emitted using xml_write/3
xml_write_canonical/3. If xml_write/3
is used, the option
layout(false) is needed to avoid changing the layout of the
SignedInfo element and the signed DOM, which
will cause the signature to be invalid.
ds:Signatureelement contains a valid signature. Certificate is bound to the certificate that appears in the element if the signature is valid. It is up to the caller to determine if the certificate is trusted or not.
Note: The DOM and SignatureDOM must have
been obtained using the load_structure/3
keep_prefix(true) otherwise it is impossible to
generate an identical document for checking the signature. See also xml_write_canonical/3.
Using SSL (in this particular case based on the OpenSSL
implementation) to connect to SSL services (e.g., an
address) easily gives a false sense of security. This section explains
some of the pitfalls.1We do not
claim to be complete, just to start warning you if security is important
to you. Please make sure you understand (Open)SSL before relying on it..
As stated in the introduction, SSL aims at solving two issues: tapping
information from the wire by means of encryption and make sure that you
are talking to the right address.
Encryption is generally well arranged as long as you ensure that the
underlying SSL library has all known security patches installed and you
use an encryption that is not known to be weak. The Windows version and
MacOS binaries of SWI-Prolog ships with its own binary of the OpenSSL
library. Ensure this is up-to-date. On systems that ship with the
OpenSSL library SWI-Prolog uses the system version. This applies notably
for all Linux packages. Check the origin and version of the OpenSSL
libraries and verify there are no more recent security patches regularly
if security is important to you. The OpenSSL library version as reported
by SSLeay_version() is available in the Prolog flag
ssl_library_version as illustrated below on Ubuntu 14.04.
?- [library(ssl)]. ?- current_prolog_flag(ssl_library_version, X). X = 'OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014'.
Whether you are talking to the right address is a complicated issue. The core of the validation is that the server provides a certificate that identifies the server. This certificate is digitally signed by another certificate, and ultimately by a root certificate. (There may be additional links in this chain as well, or there may just be one certificate signed by itself) Verifying the peer implies:
The default https client plugin (
registers the system trusted root certificate with OpenSSL. This is
achieved using the option
cacert_file(system(root_certificates)) of ssl_context/3.
The verification is left to OpenSSL. To the best of our knowledge, the
current (1.0) version of OpenSSL only implements step (1) of the
verification process outlined above. This implies that an attacker that
can control DNS mapping (host name to IP) or routing (IP to physical
machine) can fake to be a secure host as long as they manage to obtain a
certificate that is signed from a recognised authority. Version 1.0.2
supports hostname checking, and will not validate a certificate chain if
the leaf certificate does not match the hostname. 'Match' here is not a
simple string comparison; certificates are allowed (subject to many
rules) to have wildcards in their SubjectAltName field. Care must also
be taken to ensure that the name we are checking against does not
contain embedded NULLs. If SWI-Prolog is compiled against a version of
OpenSSL that does NOT have hostname checking (ie 1.0.0 or earlier), it
will attempt to do the validation itself. This is not guaranteed to be
perfect, and it only supports a small subset of allowed wildcards. If
security is important, use OpenSSL 1.0.2 or higher.
After validation, the predicate ssl_peer_certificate/2 can be used to obtain the peer certificate and inspect its properties.
To do CRL checking, pass require_crl(true) as an option to the ssl_context/3 (or http_open/3) option list. If you do this, a certificate will not be validated unless it can be checked for on a revocation list. There are two options for this:
First, you can pass a list of filenames in as the option crl/1. If the CRL corresponds to an issuer in the chain, and the issued certificate is not on the CRL, then it is assumed to not be revoked. Note that this does NOT prove the certificate is actually trustworthy - the CRL you pass may be out of date! This is quite awkward to get right, since you do not necessarily know in advance what the chain of certificates the other party will present are, so you cannot reasonably be expected to know which CRLs to pass in.
Secondly, you can handle the CRL checking in the cert_verify_hook when the Error is bound to unknown_crl. At this point you can obtain the issuer certificate (also given in the hook), find the CRL distribution point on it (the crl/1 argument), try downloading the CRL (the URL can have literally any protocol, most commonly HTTP and LDAP, but theoretically anything else, too, including the possibility that the certificate has no CRL distribution point given, and you are expected to obtain the CRL by email, fax, or telegraph. Therefore how to actually obtain a CRL is out of scope of this document), load it using load_crl/2, then check to see whether the certificate currently under scrutiny appears in the list of revocations. It is up to the application to determine what to do if the CRL cannot be obtained - either because the protocol to obtain it is not supported or because the place you are obtaining it from is not responding. Just because the CRL server is not responding does not mean that your certificate is safe, of course - it has been suggested that an ideal way to extend the life of a stolen certificate key would be to force a denial of service of the CRL server.
In some cases clients are not really interested in host validation of
the peer and whether or not the certificate can be trusted. In these
cases the client can pass
which accepts any certificate. Note that this will accept literally ANY
certificate presented - including ones which have expired, have been
revoked, and have forged signatures. This is probably not a good idea!
Applications that exchange sensitive data with e.g., a backend server
typically need to ensure they have a secure connection to their peer. To
do this, first obtain a non-secure connection to the peer (eg via a TCP
socket connection). Then create an SSL context via
For the client initiating the connection, the role is 'client', and you
should pass options host/1
at the very least. If you expect the peer to have a certificate which
would be accepted by your host system, you can pass
cacert_file(system(root_certificates)), otherwise you will
need a copy of the CA certificate which was used to sign the peer's
certificate. Alternatively, you can pass cert_verify_hook/1
to write your own custom validation for the peer's certificate.
Depending on the requirements, you may also have to provide your /own/
certificate if the peer demands mutual authentication. This is done via
and either password/1
Once you have the SSL context and the non-secure stream, you can call ssl_negotiate/5 to obtain a secure stream. ssl_negotiate/5 will raise an exception if there were any certificate errors that could not be resolved.
The peer behaves in a symmetric fashion: First, a non-secure connection is obtained, and a context is created using ssl_context/3 with the role set to server. In the server case, you must provide certificate_file/1 and key_file/1, and then either password/1 or pem_password_hook/1. If you require the other party to present a certificate as well, then peer_cert(true) should be provided. If the peer does not present a certificate, or the certificate cannot be validated as trusted, the connection will be rejected.
By default, revocation is not checked. To enable certificate revocation checking, pass require_crl(true) when creating the SSL context. See section 6 for more information about revocations.
Examples of a simple server and client (
client.pl as well as a simple HTTPS server (
can be found in the example directory which is located in
doc/packages/examples/ssl relative to the SWI-Prolog
installation directory. The
etc directory contains example
certificate files as well as a
README on the creation of
certificates using OpenSSL tools.
https:// server can be achieved using the
code skeleton below. The line
can actually be omitted because the plugin is dynamically loaded by
https scheme is detected. See section
5 for more information about security aspects.
:- use_module(library(http/http_open)). :- use_module(library(http/http_ssl_plugin)). ..., http_open(HTTPS_url, In, ), ...
The SWI-Prolog infrastructure provides two main ways to launch an HTTPS server:
library(http/thread_httpd), the server is started in HTTPS mode by adding an option
ssl/1to http_server/2. The argument of
ssl/1is an option list that is passed as the third argument to ssl_context/3.
library(http/http_unix_daemon), an HTTPS server is started by using the command line argument
Two items are typically specified as, respectively, options or additional command line arguments:
pem_password_hookcallback or, in case of the Unix daemon, via the
--passwordcommand line options.
Here is an example that uses the self-signed demo certificates distributed with the SSL package. As is typical for publicly accessible HTTPS servers, this version does not require a certificate from the client:
:- use_module(library(http/thread_httpd)). :- use_module(library(http/http_ssl_plugin)). https_server(Port, Options) :- http_server(reply, [ port(Port), ssl([ certificate_file('etc/server/server-cert.pem'), key_file('etc/server/server-key.pem'), password("apenoot1") ]) | Options ]).
There are two hooks that let you extend HTTPS servers with custom definitions:
http:ssl_server_create_hook(+SSL0, -SSL, +Options): This extensible predicate is called exactly once, after creating an HTTPS server with Options. If this predicate succeeds,
SSLis the context that is used for negotiating all new connections. Otherwise,
SSL0is used, which is the context that was created with the given options.
http:ssl_server_open_client_hook(+SSL0, -SSL, +Options): This predicate is called before each connection that the server negotiates with a client. If this predicate succeeds,
SSLis the context that is used for the new connection. Otherwise,
SSL0is used, which is the context that was created when launching the server.
Important use cases of these hooks are running dual-stack RSA/ECDSA servers, updating certificates while the server keeps running, and tweaking SSL parameters for connections. Use ssl_set_options/3 to create and configure copies of existing contexts in these hooks.
The example file
https.pl also provides a server that
does require the client to show its certificate. This provides an
additional level of security, often used to allow a selected set of
clients to perform sensitive tasks.
Note that a single Prolog program can call http_server/2
with different parameters to provide services at several security levels
as described below. These servers can either use their own dispatching
or commonly use http_dispatch/1
and check the
port property of the request to verify they
are called with the desired security level. If a service is approached
at a too low level of security, the handler can deny access or use HTTP
redirect to send the client to to appropriate interface.
The above expects Prolog to be accessible directly from the internet. This is becoming more popular now that services are often deployed using virtualization. If the Prolog services are placed behind a reverse proxy, HTTPS implementation is the task of the proxy server (e.g., Apache or Nginx). The communication from the proxy server to the Prolog server can use either plain HTTP or HTTPS. As plain HTTP is easier to setup and faster, this is typically preferred if the network between the proxy server and Prolog server can be trusted.
Note that the proxy server must decrypt the HTTPS traffic because it must decide on the destination based on the encrypted HTTP header. Port forwarding provides another option to make a server running on a machine that is not directly connected to the internet visible. It is not needed to decrypt the traffic using port forwarding, but it is also not possible to realise virtual hosts or path-based proxy rules.
Virtual hosts for HTTPS are available via Server Name Indication (SNI). This is a TLS extension that allows servers to host different domains from the same IP address. See the sni_hook/1 option of ssl_context/3 for more information.
The development of the SWI-Prolog SSL interface has been sponsored by Scientific Software and Systems Limited. The current version contains contributions from many people. Besides the mentioned authors, Markus Triska has submitted several patches, and improved and documented the integration of this package with the HTTP infrastructure.